"Зеленые" против бедных: противоречия левого энвайронментализма

В статье рассматривается вопрос о перспективах союза между идеологией энвайронментализма и левыми идейными течениями, нацеленными на решение проблем бедных и социально уязвимых. Отмечается, что, несмотря на частую критику “зеленых” за их ориентацию на интересы среднего класса и игнорирование материальных проблем социальных “низов” современные левые теоретики все чаще ассоциируют решение проблемы глобального потепления с борьбой за материальные интересы эксплуатируемых и угнетаемых. Тем не менее попытки “зеленых” сблизиться с “красными” сталкиваются с объективными реалиями, свидетельствующими о принципиальной разнице между интересами защитников окружающей среды и теми, кто сегодня нуждается в базовых материальных благах.

The article examines the prospects of an alliance between the ideology of environmentalism and left-wing ideological trends aimed at solving the problems of the poor and socially vulnerable. It is noted that although the “greens” have often been criticized for their focus on the interests of the middle class and ignoring the material problems of the social “grassroots” modern left-wing theorists increasingly associate the solution to the problem of global warming with the struggle for the material interests of the “exploited and oppressed” (representatives of the working class, precarious workers, poor residents of developing countries, minorities, etc.). It is assumed that the richest, not the poor, should pay for the energy transition; many jobs will be needed for such a transition; serious material climate damage will be prevented; residents of the poorest countries will benefit from the fight against global warming, because they are most vulnerable to droughts, floods and other potential catastrophic events. Today, it is also increasingly noted that “green” energy has already become competitive, and the main problem is in the selfish interests of capitalists. Nevertheless, as the author shows, despite the attempts of the “greens” to get closer to the “reds” objective realities indicate a fundamental difference between the interests of environmentalists and those who today need basic material goods at present. “Green” energy has not become cheaper than fossil fuels, and attempts to radically accelerate the energy transition can lead to an economic, not a climatic, catastrophe. Moreover, it is impossible to solve all the problems at once: a choice is inevitable between urgent investments in the energy transition and the achievement of other socially significant goals: affordable education, free and high-quality medicine, housing construction for all those in need, and much more.

глобальное потепление, энвайронментализм, “зеленые”, устойчивая энергетика, “Новый зеленый курс”, возобновляемые источники энергии, интерсекциональность
global warming, environmentalism, “greens”, sustainable energy, Green New Deal, renewable energy, intersectionality

Полный текст>>